Drug Discovery 2018
Poster
30

Quantifying VEGF binding at VEGFR2 and Neuropilin-1 using NanoBRET

Objective

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key mediator of angiogenesis and vascular permeability. VEGF primarily signals via VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), however signalling can be selectively potentiated by its co-receptor Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) (1). Despite approved anti-cancer therapeutics targeting VEGF signalling (2), limited quantitative information is available on the binding characteristics of VEGF to full-length VEGFR2 or NRP1. To monitor ligand binding in real-time at 37°C, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) was used to quantify interactions between fluorescent VEGF165a single-site labelled with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) (3), and N-terminal NanoLuc-tagged VEGFR2 or NRP1 expressed in living cells.
Methods: HEK293 cells stably expressing either NanoLuc-VEGFR2 or NanoLuc-NRP1 were seeded 24 hours prior to experimentation in 96-well plates. For saturation experiments, increasing concentrations of fluorescent VEGF165a-TMR was added in the presence or absence of 100nM unlabelled VEGF165a in Hanks buffered saline solution/0.1% bovine serum albumin (HBSS/BSA; pH 7.4). Following 60 minute stimulation at 37°C, the NanoLuc substrate furimazine (10μM) was added and BRET ratios were recorded using a BMG Pherastar. For kinetic experiments, fluorescent VEGF (1-20nM) was added following 5 minute furimazine incubation and BRET ratios were measured every 30 seconds for 20 minutes at 37°C. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.
Results: Saturable binding was observed for VEGF165a-TMR at both NanoLuc-VEGFR2 and NanoLuc-NRP1, for which comparable binding affinities were derived (n=5; Table 1). Minimal non-specific binding was observed for both VEGFR2 and NRP1. Real-time binding kinetics then showed VEGF165a-TMR reached maximal binding within 5 minutes at NanoLuc-NRP1 compared to 20 minutes at NanoLuc-VEGFR2 (n=5). Fitted to a simple association model, similar nanomolar affinities were also derived despite faster Kon and slower Koff rates at NanoLuc-NRP1 relative to NanoLuc-VEGFR2 (Table 1).
Conclusions: NanoBRET with fluorescently labelled VEGF quantified high affinity (nM) ligand binding of VEGF165a to NanoLuc-tagged VEGFR2 and NRP1 in living cells. Despite comparable binding affinities, VEGF165a-TMR had faster binding kinetics at NRP1 compared to VEGFR2. Measuring NanoBRET in real-time showed marked differences in the binding profiles at VEGFR2 and its co-receptor NRP1 for the first time, emphasizing the importance of ligand binding kinetics for the overall dynamics of VEGF signalling. 
References: (1) Peach et al. (2018) Intl. J. Mol. Sci. 19:1-27; (2) Ferrara and Adamis (2016) Nat. Rev. Drug  Discov. 15:385-403; (3) Kilpatrick et al. (2017) Biochem. Pharmacol. 136:62-75.

supporting document

Hosted By

ELRIG

The European Laboratory Research & Innovation Group Our Vision : To provide outstanding, leading edge knowledge to the life sciences community on an open access basis

Get the App

Get this event information on your mobile by
going to the Apple or Google Store and search for 'myEventflo'
iPhone App
Android App
www.myeventflo.com/2109