Precious Chatterje-Doody1; 1 The Open University, UK
Discussion
This paper
investigates how Russian conceptualisations of security have evolved over the
course of Putin’s leadership. It presents empirical analysis of long-term,
medium-term and immediate treatments of security in official strategic
documentation since 2000. These include national security concepts and
strategies; strategic documentation in defined priority areas; and the more
responsive articulations of the annual addresses of the Russian President to
the Federal Assembly. The findings of this documentary analysis are then
compared to the ways in which Russian elites have pursued ‘security’ in its foreign
policy, and not least in its increasing aggression and warfare in Ukraine.
The analysis demonstrates
a general baseline of inconsistencies that long characterised the Russian
political elite’s rhetoric on security. However, in the past 7-8 years meaning
has coalesced around the integration of culture and information as core
national security issues. In a similar fashion, despite longstanding
inconsistencies in the practical pursuit of ‘security’ in different foreign policy
settings, there has been a clear shift towards the active incorporation of both
information and culture/history into foreign policy actions. The one consistency
across the board has been the conflation of security with the preservation of the
interests of both the state and the ruling regime.